Network Information Hiding and Science 2.0: Can it be a Match?
Abstract
Science 2.0 aims at using the information sharingand collaborative features of the Internet to offer new features
to the research community. Science 2.0 has been already applied
to computer sciences, especially bioinformatics. For network
information hiding, a field studying the possibility of concealing a
communication in networks, the application of Science 2.0 is still
a rather uncovered territory. To foster the discussion of potential
benefits for network information hiding, we provide a disquisition
for six different Science 2.0 aspects when applied to this domain.
References
D. D. Roure, C. Goble, and R. Stevens, “The design and realisation of the virtual research environment for social sharing of workflows,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 561 – 567, 2009.
Zooniverse, “Galaxy Zoo website,” 2015, http://www.galaxyzoo.org.
Cornell University, “ArXiv website,” 2015, http://arxiv.org/.
W. Mazurczyk and L. Caviglione, “Information hiding as a challenge for malware detection,” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 89–93, 2015.
J. Priem and B. M. Hemminger, “Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social web,” First Monday, vol. 15, no. 7, July 2010.
T. Lin, “Cracking open the scientific process,” January 2012, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/science/open-science-challenges-journal-tradition-with-web-collaboration.html.
T. W. Nattkemper, “Are we ready for science 2.0?” in International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing, K. Liu and J. Filipe, Eds., Barcelona, Spain, 2012, pp. 302–306.
T. Bcheler and J. H. Sieg, “Understanding science 2.0: Crowdsourcing and open innovation in the scientific method,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 7, no. 0, pp. 327 – 329, 2011.
J. West, A. Salter, W. Vanhaverbeke, and H. Chesbrough, “Open innovation: The next decade,” Research Policy, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 805 – 811, 2014, open Innovation: New Insights and Evidence.
C. Franzoni and H. Sauermann, “Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects,” Research Policy, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1 – 20, 2014.
K. Laursen and A. J. Salter, “The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration,” Research Policy, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 867 – 878, 2014, open Innovation: New Insights and Evidence.
T. Anderson, “Conference reviewing considered harmful,” ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 108–116, 2009.
A. Aviẑienis, J.-C. Laprie, B. Randell, and C. Landwehr, “Basic concepts and taxonomy of depandable and secure computing,” IEEE Trans. Depandable and Secure Computing, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–33, 2004.
D. K. Simonton, Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
S. Wendzel, S. Zander, B. Fechner, and C. Herdin, “Pattern-based survey and categorization of network covert channel techniques,” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 47, no. 3, 2015.
W. Mazurczyk and L. Caviglione, “Steganography in modern smart-phones and mitigation techniques,” Communications Surveys Tutorials, IEEE, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 334–357, Firstquarter 2015.
“User interface design patterns,” 2015, http://ui-patterns.com/patterns.
“Github website,” 2015, https://github.com/.
M. McLennan and R. Kennell, “Hubzero: A platform for dissemination and collaboration in computational science and engineering,” Computing in Science Engineering, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 48–53, March 2010.
S. Wendzel and W. Mazurczyk, “Poster: An educational network protocol for covert channel analysis using patterns,” in Proc. 23rd ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS). ACM, 2016, pp. 1739–1741.
F. Bertolotti, E. Mattarelli, M. Vignoli, and D. M. Macr, “Exploring the relationship between multiple team membership and team performance: The role of social networks and collaborative technology,” Research Policy, vol. 44, pp. 911–924, 2015.
R. Van Noorden, “Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network,” Nature (News Feature), vol. 512, pp. 126–129, August 2014.
Google Inc., “Google scholar website,” 2015, http://scholar.google.de/.
ResearchGate GmbH, “ResearchGate website,” 2015, http://www.researchgate.net/.
“Overleaf website,” 2015, https://www.overleaf.com/.
“Authorea website,” 2015, https://www.authorea.com.
Mendeley Ltd., “Mendeley website,” 2015, https://www.mendeley.com.
K. A. Khor and L.-G. Yu, “Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young unviersities,” Scientometrics, vol. 107, pp. 1095–1110, 2016.
J. Kosten, “A classification of the use of research indicators,” Scientometrics, vol. 108, pp. 457–464, 2016.
J. C. Mogul, “Towards more constructive reviewing of CS papers,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 90–94, Jul. 2013.
B. Meyer, “The nastiness problem in computer science,” BLOG@CACM, August 2011, http://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/123611-the-nastiness-problem-in-computer-science/.
R. A. Kemmerer, “Shared resource matrix methodology: an approach to identifying storage and timing channels,” ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 256–277, 1983.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s. The undersigned also warrants that the manuscript (or its essential substance) has not been published other than as an abstract or doctorate thesis and has not been submitted for consideration elsewhere, for print, electronic or digital publication.
3. User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) under the following conditions: 1. they must attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor, 2. they may alter, transform, or build upon this work, 3. they may use this contribution for commercial purposes.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- the right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- the right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale,
- the right to self-archive the article
- the right to supervision over the integrity of the content of the work and its fair use.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or the Journal Owner upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the Journal Owner. The author and the Journal Owner may agree to terminate this agreement at any time. This agreement or any license granted in it cannot be terminated otherwise than in accordance with this section 6. This License shall remain in effect throughout the term of copyright in the Work and may not be revoked without the express written consent of both parties.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by the Journal Owner or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
The Journal Owner will publish the article (or have it published) in the Journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and the Journal Owner or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Where such obligation depends on the payment of a fee, it shall not be deemed to exist until such time as that fee is paid. The Journal Owner may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization and usage that it deems appropriate. The Journal Owner will be allowed to sublicense the rights that are licensed to it under this agreement. This agreement will be governed by the laws of Poland.
By signing this License, Author(s) warrant(s) that they have the full power to enter into this agreement. This License shall remain in effect throughout the term of copyright in the Work and may not be revoked without the express written consent of both parties.
